The Role of Environmental Justice in Biodiversity Conservation: Investigating experiences of communities near Kruger National Park, South Africa
Keywords:
Environmental Justice, Biodiversity Conservation, Kruger National ParkAbstract
This paper uses an environmental justice framework to examine the experiences of marginalized communities near Kruger National Park. While biodiversity conservation has been predominantly understood as a neutral and ahistorical objective, a critical perspective reveals that a range of power relations inform its definitions and processes. Further, the spaces in which conservation efforts are undertaken are vulnerable to reproducing inequalities of the larger society in which they are situated. I establish biodiversity conservation in Kruger as an environmental justice issue and frame the discussion regarding communities near the Park within the categories of (a) land ownership and resource use, (b) community participation in park management and decision-making, and (c) justly shared economic and socio-cultural benefits. While improvements have occurred, the maintenance of Kruger requires integrating an environmental justice perspective to its programs and a more meaningful partnership with surrounding marginalized communities to ensure equitable use and benefits of the Park.References
Anthony, B. (2007). The dual nature of parks: Attitudes of neighbouring communities towards Kruger National Park, South Africa. Environmental Conservation, 34(3), 236-245.
Bullard, R. D. (1999). Dismantling Environmental Racism in the USA. Local Environment, 4(1), 5-19.
Cock, J. & Fig, D. (2000). From colonial to community based conservation: Environmental justice and the national parks of South Africa. Society in Transition, 31(1). doi: 10.1080/21528586.2000.10419008
Dahlberg, A, Rohde, R., & Sandell, K. (2010). National parks and environmental justice: Comparing access rights and ideological legacies in three countries. Conservation and Society, 8(3), 209-224.
Human Rights and Equity Office [HREO]. (n.d.). Understanding racialization: Creating a racially equitable university [booklet]. Retrieved from https://www.uoguelph.ca/hreo/system/files/UnderstandingRacialization.pdf
Iles, A. (2009). Differential obligations: Equity under the biodiversity convention. Leiden Journal of International Law, 16(2), 217-251. doi:10.1017/S0922156503001134
Kepe, T. (2009). Shaped by race: Why “race” still matters in the challenges facing biodiversity conservation in Africa. Local Environment, 14(9), 871-878.
Liu, A. & Saal, D. S. (2001). Structural change in apartheid-era South Africa: 1975-93. Economic Systems Research, 13(3), 235-257.
Reid, H. (2001). Contractual national parks and the Makuleke community. Human Ecology, 29(2), 135-155.
Scheyvens, R. (1999). Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities. Tourism Management, 20, p. 245-249.
Siyabona Africa: Your Informed African Travel Partner. (n.d.). History of Paul Kruger, Kruger National Park. Retrieved from http://www.krugerpark.co.za/Krugerpark_History-travel/paul-kruger-history.html
Strickland-Munro, J. K., Moore S. A., & Freitag-Ronaldson, S. (2010). The impacts of tourism on two communities adjacent to the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 27(5), 663-678. doi:1 0.1080/0376835X.2010.522829
Tanner, R., Freimund, W., & Van Wyk, E. (2010). Legitimacy and the use of natural resources in Kruger National Park, South Africa. International Journal of Sociology, 40(3), 71-85. doi: 10.2753/IJS0020-7659400304
Timko, J. A. & Satterfield, T. (2008). Seeking social equity in national parks: Experiments with evaluation in Canada and South Africa. Conservation and Society, 6(3), 238-254.
West, P., Igoe, J., & Brockington, D. Parks and peoples: The social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35(1), 251-277. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Papers published in the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management must be the original, unpublished work of the author. Contributors are responsible for obtaining any copyright clearances required in relation to their work.
Authors submitting a paper to the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management automatically agree to grant a limited license to DJIM if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. This license gives permission for DJIM to publish the paper in a given issue and to maintain the work in the electronic journal archive. DJIM also submits issues to institutional repositories and Open Access repositories.
Contributors agree to each reader accessing, downloading, or printing one copy of their article for their own personal use or research. All other copyrights remain with the author, subject to the requirements that any republication of the work be accompanied by an acknowledgement that the work was first published in the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management and that the DJIM Editorial Chair must be notified of any republication of a work first published in DJIM.
Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management
c/o School of Information Management
Faculty of Management
Dalhousie University
Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building
6100 University Avenue
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5
Canada
Email: djim@dal.ca
Authors should recognize that, because of the nature of the Internet, the publisher has no control over unauthorized copying or editing of protected works.
