Implementing Research Data Management Services in a Canadian Context

Authors

  • Tess Grynoch MLIS, Dalhousie University

Keywords:

Research data management, Academic libraries

Abstract

Research data management (RDM) has become an increasingly pressing issue for academic libraries as they strive to assist researchers in addressing new public funding requirements surrounding data dissemination and preservation. Briney, Goben, & Zilinski (2015) reviewed several characteristics of RDM service provision efforts by 206 American research universities. Following a similar methodology, the author reviewed RDM service development within Canadian research universities and compared the results to the American efforts. The  main area requiring development in Canada is the provision of RDM services. Therefore, some current best practices for implementing RDM services were gathered through a literature review. The successful approaches highlighted in the literature include awareness of funder and institutional data policies, reaching out to data service providers on campus and beyond, understanding researcher data management needs and finding RDM champions, implementing research data services strategically, planning for growth in RDM services, marketing the RDM services, and creating incentives to create data management plans and utilize RDM services. Third Place DJIM Best Article Award.

Author Biography

Tess Grynoch, MLIS, Dalhousie University

Tess Grynoch is a Masters student in the Library and Information Studies program at Dalhousie University, candidate 2016. Prior to her move to Halifax, she could be seen cataloguing at the University of Alberta Libraries. She has a Bachelor of Science from the University of Alberta and has spent a semester studying at the University of Canterbury in Christchurch, New Zealand. Tess‘ practicum at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Libraries exposed her to research data management services development and she is currently building her research data management skills through a project with the Dalhousie Libraries.

References

Bishoff, C., & Johnston, L. (2015). Approaches to data sharing: An analysis of NSF data management plans from a large research university. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 3(2), 1–27. doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.1231

Briney, K. (2014). Lightning talk summary. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 40(6), 35–37. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2373-9223

Briney, K., Goben, A., & Zilinski, L. (2015). Do you have an institutional data policy? A review of the current landscape of library data services and institutional data policies. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 3(2), 1–25. doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.1232

Buys, C. M., & Shaw, P. L. (2015). Data management practices across an institution: Survey and report. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 3(2), 1–24. doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.1225

Choudhury, S. (2012). ASERL webinar: Data conservancy & data management services at Johns Hopkins University Libraries. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/36050328

Christensen-Dalsgaard, B., van den Berg, M., Grim, R., Horstmann, W., Jansen, D., Pollard, T., & Roos, A. (2012). Ten recommendations for libraries to get started with research data management: Final report of the LIBER working group on E-Science / Research Data Management. Retrieved November 13, 2015, from http://libereurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/The research data group 2012v7 final.pdf

Cox, A. M., & Corrall, S. (2013). Evolving academic library specialties. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 64(8), 1526–1542. doi: 10.1002/asi.22847

Creamer, A. (2015). Current issues and approaches to curating student research data. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 41(6), 22–25. doi:10.1002/bult.2015.1720410610

Davis, H. M., & Cross, W. M. (2015). Using a data management plan review service as a training ground for librarians. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 3(2), 1–20. doi: 10.7710/21623309.1243

Doty, J., Herndon, J., Lyle, J., & Stephenson, L. (2014). Learning to curate. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 40(6), 31–34. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2373-9223

Doty, J., Kowalski, M. T., Nash, B. C., & O‘Riordan, S. F. (2015). Making student research data discoverable: A pilot program using Dataverse. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 3(2), 1–25. doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.1234

Eaker, C. (2014). Educating researchers for effective data management. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 40(3), 45–46. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2373-9223

Fox, R. (2013). The art and science of data curation. OCLC Systems & Services, 29(4), 195–199. doi: 10.1108/OCLC-07-2013-0021

Giarlo, M. J. (2013). Academic libraries as data quality hubs. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 1(3), 1–10. doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.1059

Gordon, A. S., Millman, D. S., Steiger, L., Adolph, K. E., & Gilmore, R. O. (2015). Researcher-library collaborations: Data repositories as a service for researchers. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 3(2), 1–17. doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.1238

Government of Canada. (2015). Draft Tri-Agency Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management - Science.gc.ca. Retrieved from http://www.science.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=83F7624E-1

Greenberg, J., White, H. C., Carrier, S., & Scherle, R. (2009). A metadata best practice for a scientific data repository. Journal of Library Metadata, 9(3/4), 194–212. doi: 10.1080/19386380903405090

Hayslett, M. (2015). Data world does not lack standards. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 3(2), 1–5. doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.1245

Henderson, M. E., & Knott, T. L. (2015). Starting a research data management program based in a university library. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 34(1), 47–59. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2015.986783

Henderson, M., Raboin, R., Shorish, Y., & Van Tuyl, S. (2014). Research data management on a shoestring budget. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 40(6), 14–17. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2373-9223

Herold, P. (2015). Data sharing among ecology, evolution, and natural resources scientists: An analysis of selected publications. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 3(2), 1–23. doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.1244

Huwe, T. K. (2013). Data discovery and data curation going hand in hand. Computers in Libraries, 33(3), 17–19. Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/

Johnston, L. R. (2014). Developing a data curation service: Step #1: Work with what you‘ve got. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 40(4), 45–47. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2373-9223

Joint Task Force on Librarian‘s Competencies in Support of E-Research and Scholarly Communication. (2015). Librarians‘ competencies profile for research data management. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/document/d/15Kqg6w6AFsdbbaxcRCx7DZ3OERnQk6E0UhQ4UeRu0Cc/edit

Knight, G. (2015). Building a research data management service for the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Program: Electronic Library & Information Systems, 49(4), 424 - 439. doi: 10.1108/PROG-012015-0011

Knuth, S. L., Johnson, A. M., & Hauser, T. (2015). Research data services at the University of Colorado Boulder. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 41(6), 35–38. doi: 10.1002/bult.2015.1720410614

Kouper, I., Akers, K., & Lavin, M. (2013). Data curators at work: Focus on projects and experiences. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 40(1), 45–46. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2373-9223

Mannheimer, S. (2014). Ready, engage! Outreach for library data services. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 41(1), 42–44. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2373-9223

Mclure, M., Level, A. V, Cranston, C. L., Oehlerts, B., & Culbertson, M. (2014). Data curation: A study of researcher practices and needs. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 14(2), 139–164.

Newton, M. P., Miller, C. C., & Bracke, M. S. (2011). Librarian roles in institutional repository data set collecting: Outcomes of a research library task force. Collection Management, 36(1), 53–67. doi: 10.1080/01462679.2011.530546

Ogier, A., Hall, M., Bailey, A., & Stovall, C. (2014). Data management inside the library: Assessing electronic resources data using the data asset framework methodology. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 26(2), 101–113. doi: 10.1080/1941126X.2014.910406

Raboin, R. (2015, June 13). Testimony from “Teaching research data management with the New England Collaborative Data Management Curriculum”, SLA 2015 Annual Conference, Boston, Massachusetts.

Read, K. B., Surkis, A., Larson, C., McCrillis, A., Graff, A., Nicholson, J., & Xu, J. (2015). Starting the data conversation: Informing data services at an academic health sciences library. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103(3), 131–135. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.005

Saunders, L. (2015). Academic libraries‘ strategic plans: Top trends and under-recognized areas. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 285–291. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.011

Shen, Y., & Varvel, V. E. (2013). Developing data management services at the Johns Hopkins University. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(6), 552-557. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2013.06.002

Toups, M., & Hughes, M. (2013). When data curation isn‘t: A redefinition for liberal arts universities. Journal of Library Administration, 53(4), 223–233. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2013.865386

Varvel, V. E., & Shen, Y. (2013). Data management consulting at the Johns Hopkins University. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 19(3), 224–245. doi: 10.1080/13614533.2013.768277

Vitale, C. R. H., Marshall, B., & Nurnberger, A. (2015). You‘re in good company: Unifying campus research data services. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 41(6), 26-28. doi: 10.1002/bult.2015.1720410611

Walker, W., & Keenan, T. (2015). Going beyond availability: Truly accessible research data. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 3(2), 1–8. doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.1223

White, H. C. (2014). Descriptive metadata for scientific data repositories: A comparison of information scientist and scientist organizing behaviors. Journal of Library Metadata, 14(1), 24–51. doi: 10.1080/19386389.2014.891896

Whitmire, A. L. (2015). Implementing a graduate-level research data management course: Approach, outcomes, and lessons learned. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 3(2), 1–22. doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.1246

Witt, M. (2012). Co-designing, co-developing, and co-implementing an institutional data repository service. Journal of Library Administration, 52(2), 172–188. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2012.655607

Wright, S., Whitmire, A., Zilinski, L., & Minor, D. (2014). Collaboration and tension between institutions and units providing data management support. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 40(6), 18–21. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2373-9223

Downloads

Published

2016-04-02

Issue

Section

Articles