Pixelated vision: Validation of the complaint with no objective findings

Authors

  • Emily A.L. Sheppard
  • Kevin E. Gordon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.Vol47No1.10724

Abstract

Background: We encountered a young female presenting with a complaint of “pixelated vision”. A brief literature search at the time of consultation showed no peer reviewed publications. Our objective was to use an infodemiologic approach to investigate the possible occurrence of an unidentified visual phenomenon.

Methods: An Internet search with the metabrowser search engine Dogpile (www.dogpile.com) was conducted on April 24, 2018, using free text words “pixelated” and “vision.” The first 100 results were scanned for forum posts and cross-referenced to minimize duplication.

Results: Of the first 100 results, 15 unique posts were identified. The majority of posts were made by the affected individual (n=14, 93%). Sex was female (n=5, 33%), male (n=2, 13%) or unknown (n=8, 53%). Onset was identified as new (n=10, 67%) or chronic (n=5, 33%).

Conclusion: The availability and content of these forum postings suggest that pixelated vision is an uncommon, non-pathological visual phenomenon not yet documented in conventional medical literature.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-11

How to Cite

Sheppard, E. A., & Gordon, K. E. (2021). Pixelated vision: Validation of the complaint with no objective findings. DALHOUSIE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.Vol47No1.10724

Issue

Vol. 47 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Research

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).