Why Prostate Cancer Screening is Not Recommended
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.Vol32No1.4260Abstract
Prostate cancer screening in low risk men is a very controversial issue. Epidemiologically, screening is justified due to the importance of the disease and the lack of primary prevention. Prostate cancer's natural history however, makes it more likely that men will die with, rather than from, prostate cancer. Despite the significant absence of evidence showing the beneficial results and the definite evidence demonstrating harm, screening continues to be done in medical specialties throughout the western world. This is often achieved through considerable cost to both the health care system and to the patient. The purpose of this paper is to present evidence that a prostate cancer screening program for low risk men is not currently justified with the modalities available today and to reiterate the need for research that either finds new, more effective methods of screening or identifies populations of patients wh can benefit from the current screening tools. Here recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC) are evaluated through a discussion about the pitfalls of prostate cancer screening today as wekk as a review of the literature.Published
2004-04-12
How to Cite
Power, N., & Bell, D. (2004). Why Prostate Cancer Screening is Not Recommended. DALHOUSIE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.Vol32No1.4260
Issue
Section
Review
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).