Why the Medical Humanities?

Authors

  • T. J. Murray Professor of Medical Humanities Dalhousie University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.Vol26No1.4424

Abstract

In the Gilman Lecture to Johns Hopkins Medical School in November 18, 1984, Canadian novelist Robertson Davies called his talk “Can a Doctor be a Humanist”, but said the title should be, “Can a Doctor Possibly Be a Humanist in a Society that Increasingly Tempts Him to be a Scientist?” He spoke of the cadeuces, that symbol with the two serpents entwined on the staff, one Knowledge and one Wisdom. The legend said that the warring serpents were writhing on the ground but were pacified by Hermes who passed a staff between them. Davies said Knowledge and Wisdom aren't necessarily opponents, but they are opposites, and they must be reconciled and made supporters of each other. For the physician, Knowledge comes from without, and from education and study, enabling him to help patients. Wisdom, on the other hand, is an introverted element of the doctor's psyche, coming from within...

"and it is what makes him look not at the disease, but at the bearer of the disease. It is what creates the link that unites the healer with his patient, and the exercise of which makes him a true physician, a true healer, a true child of Hermes. It is Wisdom that tells the physician how to make the patient a partner in his own cure. Instead of calling them Knowledge and Wisdom, let us call them Science and Humanism." (1)

Downloads

How to Cite

Murray, T. J. (1998). Why the Medical Humanities?. DALHOUSIE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.Vol26No1.4424

Issue

Section

Focus on Medical Humanities