Understanding Student Perceptions of Generative Text Artificial Intelligence in Writing Centres
Abstract
Have students ceded the process of academic writing to genAI? Have faculty, on students’ behalf? And what role do writing centres play? Since the advent of large language model (LLM) generative-text artificial intelligence (genAI) two years ago, writing pedagogy and student conduct have received enormous scrutiny. Institutions have responded to genAI by releasing guidelines, recommendations, information, and limited policy pieces. But questions abound regarding how faculty are actually regulating and discussing genAI tools with students in the classroom, and how students perceive and negotiate genAI in university writing assignments. Our study seeks to reveal answers to these questions, and especially where and how writing centres figure in. In this session, we will present on the development of our study, and early findings from our faculty survey.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).