Reading Quizzes for Upper Year Seminars
Abstract
Class discussions always go better when people are prepared. To encourage students to prioritize readings for an upper year seminar, I instituted short answer reading quizzes at the beginning of every class modeled from Clinton and Kohlmeyer (2005). This seminar entailed weekly readings (approximately 30 to 50 pages) and such readings were typically empirical papers. Quizzes were structured to comprise two to three open ended questions and were first completed individually and handed to the instructor. Once completed, groups of 3-4 students received a clean copy of the quiz to complete together. Both individual and group quizzes were graded. An average score based on the individual results of the group was calculated and if the score on the group quiz was higher than the average, the difference was added to each individual score. In addition to enhancing engagement and learning (e.g., Hodges et al., 2015; Tropman, 2014; Wambuguh & Yonn-Brown, 2013), the use of both individual and group quizzes was intended to limit students‘ anxieties related to quizzes and, at the same time, students who had not completed the readings would benefit less than those who had completed the work. Observations across three iterations of the seminar highlight the added benefit of group quizzes for fostering enthusiastic and rewarding discussions. Moreover, feedback from students on end of semester anonymous surveys support the use of individual and group quizzes for active learning.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).