Repatriation of Indigenous Human Remains in Canada: An Analysis of the Issue and Relevant Policies

Authors

  • Charlie Hook

Keywords:

Indigenous, human remains, repatriation, policies

Abstract

On June 21, 2021, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) came into force as legislation in Canada, becoming the first real piece of legislation governing the use and repatriation of Indigenous artefacts and human remains in the country. Although Canada has had stories of successful repatriation prior to UNDRIP becoming law, most of the literature on the subject of repatriation and relevant policies come from the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand. This paper proposes to look at the issue of the repatriation of Indigenous human remains and relevant policies in Canada through the lens of said literature available from other countries. The main threads through which this subject is analysed are the material and cultural importance of repatriation to Indigenous communities; the flaws in existing legislation and policies, both in Canada and abroad; and the lack of financial resources available to ensure the full enforcement of existing legislation and policies, to Indigenous groups seeking the repatriation of their cultural and human remains, as well as voluntary repatriation efforts from institutions not under legislative or policy obligations. This paper ultimately finds that existing legislation is inadequate, as it favours settler values, states, and institutions, rather than the cultural and material importance of repatriation for Indigenous communities.

References

American Museum of Natural History. (n.d.). https://www.amnh.org

Assembly of First Nations & Canadian Museums Association. (1994). Task Force Report on Museums and First Peoples. Canadian Museums Association. https://museums.in1touch.org/uploaded/web/docs/Task_Force_Report_1994.pdf

Ball, D. P. (2020, June 13). How Indigenous researchers are reclaiming archeology, anthropology. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/british-columbia/article-how-indigenous-researchers-are-reclaiming-archeology-and-anthropology/

Bernstien, J. (2021, July). When it‘s time to give back. Maclean‘s. https://archive.macleans.ca/article/2021/7/1/when-its-time-to-give-back

Canadian Museums Association. (2022, September 27). Museums moved to action: Advancing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission‘s Call to Action #67. Cision. https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/museums-moved-to-action-advancing-the-truth-and-reconciliation-commission-s-call-to-action-67-885901925.html

Collison, J. N. (2021, December 3). “These pieces are part of us”: Repatriating belongings and remains stolen from Indigenous peoples [interview]. The Current; CBC Radio. https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-dec-3-2021-1.6272173/these-pieces-are-part-of-us-repatriating-belongings-and-remains-stolen-from-indigenous-peoples-1.6272889

Danyluk, S. & MacKenzie, R. (2022). Moved to action: Activating UNDRIP in Canadian museums. Canadian Museums Association.Deer, K. (2021, September 29). Why it's difficult to put a number on how many children died at residential schools. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/residential-school-children-deaths-numbers-1.6182456

Edgar, H. J. H. & Rautman, A. L. M. (2014). Contemporary museum policies and the ethics of accepting human remains. Curator: The Museum Journal 57(2), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12064

Halcrow, S., Aranui, A., Halmhofer, S., Heppner, A., Johnson, N., Killgrove, K., Robbins Schug, G. (2021). Moving beyond Weiss and Springer‘s Repatriation and Erasing the Past: Indigenous values, relationships, and research. Journal of Cultural Property 28, 211-220.

The Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Committee of Canada. (2015). https://pm.gc.ca/en/news/backgrounders/2015/12/15/final-report-truth-and-reconciliation-commission-canada

Hubert, J., & Fforde, C. (2005). The reburial issue in the twenty-first century. In G. Corsane (Ed.), Heritage, museums and galleries: An introductory reader (pp. 116-132). Routledge.

List of residential schools. (n.d.). Residential Schools Settlement - Official Court Website. https://residentialschoolsettlement.ca/schools.html

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq., 104 Stat 3048 (1990).

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. (2007, September 13). United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.html

The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. SC 2021, c.14

Orona, B., & Esquivido, V. (2020). Continued disembodiment: NAGPRA, CAL NAGPRA, and recognition. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations 42, 50-68.

Rugg, J. (2017). Materiality, identity, mutability: Irresolvable tensions within burial reform. In J. Bradbury & C. Scarre (Eds.), Engaging with the dead: Exploring changing human Beliefs about death, mortality and the huma body (Studies in Funerary Archeology, Vol. 13, pp. 210-216). Oxbow Books.

Weiss, E., & Springer, J.W. (2020). Repatriation and Erasing the Past. University of Florida Press.

Whittam, J. (2015). “In a Good Way”: repatriation, community, and development in Kitigan Zibi. Anthropologica, 57(2), 501-509. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26350458

World Archeological Congress. (1990). First Code of Ethics. World Archeological Congress. https://worldarch.org/code-of-ethics/

World Archeological Congress. (1989). The Vermillion Accord on Human Remains. World Archeological Congress. https://worldarch.org/code-of-ethics/

Downloads

Published

2023-07-04

Issue

Section

Articles