Grief in the age of AI: Griefbots and online death spaces

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5931/djim.v19i1.12430

Abstract

This paper explores how grief is intertwined within artificial intelligence (AI) and other digital areas. It examines concepts such as the griefbot, an AI used to provide communication between the deceased and the bereaved, digital online memorial spaces to commemorate those who have passed, and digital immortality. While griefbots provide comfort to those who have lost a loved one, questions surrounding ethics of use, such as obtaining the consent of the deceased, using the deceased’s data, and respecting their privacy, remain relevant. The digital afterlife industry, which includes online memorials, puts into question several societal challenges. These chal­lenges can lead to debates over who “deserves” the most to have access data and digital spaces. Capitalism and digital immortality may reveal power dynamics with the deceased. For instance, business leaders and public figures may leave behind a digital legacy to continue to wield au­thority beyond the life of their physical bodies. As societies continue to merge aspects of human lives (and deaths) into the digital world, we must address issues of consent, privacy, and equita­ble access. Grieving and remembrance must not be lost in the digital age.

References

Bassett, D. J. (2015). Who wants to live forever? Living, dying and grieving in our digital society. Social Sciences, 4(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci4041127

Edwards, L., & Harbinja, E. (2013). Protecting post-mortem privacy: Reconsidering the privacy interests of the deceased in a digital world. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 32(1), 83–130.

Hollanek, T., & Nowaczyk-Basińska, K. (2024). Griefbots, deadbots, postmortem avatars: On responsible applications of generative AI in the digital afterlife industry. Philosophy & Technology, 37(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00744-w

Jiménez-Alonso, B., & Brescó de Luna, I. (2023). Griefbots. A new way of communicating with the dead? Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 57(2), 466–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09679-3

Neimeyer, R. A. (2001). Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss. American Psychological Association.

Öhman, C., & Floridi, L. (2018). An ethical framework for the digital afterlife industry. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(5), 318–320. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0335-2

Project December. (n.d.). Project December: Simulate the dead. Retrieved March 12, 2025, from https://projectdecember.net/

Savin-Baden, M., Burden, D., & Taylor, H. (2017). The ethics and impact of digital immortality. Knowledge Cultures, 5(02), 178–196.

Sofka, C. J. (1997). Social support “internetworks,” caskets for sale, and more: Thanatology and the information superhighway. Death Studies, 21(6), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/074811897201778

Downloads

Published

2025-03-20

Issue

Section

Articles