Submit or Resist: Google, is there a Third Way?

Authors

  • Deborah Hicks

Keywords:

Google

Abstract

This article explores the impact that Google is having on the library profession. Google is enticing users away from their local libraries with its siren song of easy use and "good enough" results, and librarians are struggling to come to terms with the loss of users. In response, the library community has divided itself into two "sides": those who want librarians to "submit" to the search capabilities of Google (the Googleizers) and those who want librarians to return to the profession's traditional role of information gatekeeping. This paper proposes that there is a potential revolutionary third option for librarianship: the librarian as an activist for the right to communicate.

References

Stephen Abram, 2005. The Google Opportunity,Library Journal, volume 130, number 2 (1 February), pp. 34-35.<br />Frode Bakken, 1998. The Possible Role of Libraries in the Digital Future, Libri, volume 48, number 2, pp. 81-87<br />Steven Bell, 2004. The Infodiet: How Libraries Can Offer an Appetizing Alternative to Google, The Chronicle of Higher Education, volume 50, number 24 (20 February), pp. B15.<br />Steven Bell, 2005. Don&rsquo;t Surrender Library Values, Library Journal, volume 130, number 9, (15 May), pp. 79.<br />Gordon Flagg, 2005. Google at the Gate, American Libraries, volume 36, number 3 (March), pp. 40-44.<br />Google Book Search Library Project at http://books.google.com/googlebooks/library.html&lt;/a&gt;, accessed 28 November, 2005.<br />Google Technology at http://www.google.com/technology, accessed 28 November, 2005.<br />Michael Gorman, 1995. Five New Laws of Librarianship, American Libraries, volume 26, number 8 (September), pp. 784-785.<br />Michael Gorman, 1998. Five Laws of Library Science: Then and Now, School Library Journal, volume 44, number 7 (July), pp. 20-24.<br />Mark Y.Herring, 2005. Don&rsquo;t Get Goggle-Eyed Over Google&rsquo;s Plan to Digitize The Chronicle of Higher Education, volume 51, number 27 (11 March), pp. B20<br />Michael A. Keller, Victoria A. Reich, and Andrew C. Herkovic, 2003. ?What is a library anymore, anyway? First Monday, volume 8, number 5 (May), at http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_5/keller/index.html, accessed 28 November, 2005.<br />Brian Kenney, 2004. Googleizers vs. Resistors, Library Journal, volume 129, number 20 (December), pp. 44-46.<br />F.W. Lancaster, 1999. Second Thoughts of the Paperless Society, Library Journal, volume 124, number 15 (15 September), pp. 48-50.<br />Thomas Mann, 2005. Google Print vs. Onsite Collections, American Libraries, volume 36, number 7 (August), pp. 45-46.<br />Charles Martell, 2000. The Disembodied Librarian in the Digital Age, College and Research Libraries, volume 61, number 1 (January), pp. 10-25.<br />Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management &ndash; Volume 2 &ndash; Spring 2006 13<br />Charles Martell, 2000. The Disembodied Librarian in the Digital Age, Part II, College and Research Libraries, volume 61, number 2 (March), pp. 99-113.<br />William J. McIver, Jr., William F. Birdsall, and Merrilee Rasmussen, 2003. The Internet and the Right to Communicate, volume 8, number 12 (December), at http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_12/mciver/index.html, accessed 30 November, 2005.<br />S.R. Ranganathan, 1957. The Five Laws of Library Science (2nd ed.). London: Blunt and Sons, Ltd.<br />R.E. Rubin, 2004. Foundations of library and information science (2nd ed.). New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.<br />United Nations All human rights of all: Fiftieth anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948-1998: Universal Declaration of Human Rights, at http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html, accessed 30 November, 2005.<br />

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles