Protecting Personal Information

Authors

  • Nathaniel Smith

Abstract

 

This paper looks at Nova Scotia's Personal Information International Disclosure Protection Act (PIIDPA), a piece of legislation that was specifically designed to protect Nova Scotia's citizens from having their personal information accessed by foreign governments. This is a direct reaction to new powers the United States government has given itself, through the USA Patriot Act, in collecting information to protect Americans from terrorism.

The main thesis of my paper will be to determine whether this piece of legislation is an effective piece of public policy, asking the question: Does Nova Scotia, through PIIDPA, have the ability to protect Nova Scotians from having their personal information accessed by foreign governments? Using a policy framework designed by political scientists Paul Sabatier and Daniel Mazmanian (1980) to analyse policy effectiveness I will determine whether PIIDPA is an act that will effectively do what it was created to do, or whether it will face problems in achieving those goals.

References

American Civil Liberties Union. (2007). Reform the Patriot Act, Section 215. Retrieved<br /> <br /> November 19, 2007 from http://action.aclu.org/reformthepatriotact/215.html<br /> <br /> Associated Press, The. (2006, August 17). U.S. judge rules warrantless wiretapping unconstitutional. International Herald Tribune. Retrieved December 15, 2007 from Zttp://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/08/17/america/NA_GEN_US_Domestic_Spying_Lawsuit.php<br /> <br /> BC Government and Service Employees' Union v. British Columbia (Minister of Health Services). (2007). Burnaby: British Columbia Government and Service Employees Union.<br /> <br /> BC Government and Service Employees' Union v. British Columbia (Minister of Health Services). (2004). Submission on the Patriot Act, Submission to the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia. Burnaby: British Columbia Government and Service Employees Union.<br /> <br /> Brown, M. P. (1992). Organizational design as policy instruments: Environment Canada in the Canadian bureaucracy. In R. Boardman (Ed.), Canadian Environmental Policy: Ecosystems, Politics, and Process (pp. 24-42). Toronto: Oxford University Press.<br /> <br /> EKOS Research Associates. (2006). Revisiting the privacy landscape a year later, submitted to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, March 2006. Retrieved December 16, 2007 from http://www.privocom.gc.ca/information/survey/2006/ekos_2006_e.asp#section2<br /> <br /> Furlong, M. (2007, January 28). Personal information is being protected. The Chronicle Herald, p. E7.<br /> <br /> Government of Canada. (1985). Criminal Code of Canada. Ottawa: Author.<br /> <br /> Government of Canada &ndash; Department of Justice. (2001). Backgrounder: highlights of Anti-Terrorism Act. Retrieved December 15, 2007, from http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/news/nr/2001/doc_27787.html<br /> <br /> Ibbitson, J. (2001, October 27). Antiterrorism bill becomes U.S. law. The Globe and Mail, p. A14. Protecting Personal Information 18<br /> <br /> Jenkins, D. (2003). In Support of Canada's Anti-Terrorism Act: A Comparison of Canadian, British, and American Anti-Terrorism Law. Saskatchewan Law Review, 66, 419-454.<br /> <br /> MacGregor, R. (2001, October 7). Jefferson's words twisted by terrorists. The Globe and Mail, p. A15.<br /> <br /> Nova Scotia Legislature. (2006, July 6). Hansard: Debates and Proceedings. Halifax: Queen's Printer.<br /> <br /> Office of the Auditor General of Nova Scotia. (2005). Electronic information security and privacy protection. Annual Report of the Auditor General of Nova Scotia, 31-41.<br /> <br /> Office of the Information &amp; Privacy Commissioner of British Columbia. (2004). Privacy and the USA Patriot Act: Implications for British Columbia Public Sector Outsourcing. Victoria: Author.<br /> <br /> Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. (2007a). Fact Sheet: Privacy Legislation in Canada. Retrieved December 16, 2007, from http://www.privcom.gc.ca/fs-fi/02_05_d_15_e.asp<br /> <br /> Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. (2007b). Fact Sheet: Questions and Answers regarding the application of PIPEDA, Alberta and British Columbia's Personal Information Protection Acts (PIPAs). Retrieved December 16, 2007, from http://www.privcom.gc.ca/fs-fi/02_05_d_26_e.asp<br /> <br /> Patriots to Restore Checks and Balances. (2007). About Us. Retrieved November 20, 2007, from http://www.checksbalances.org/aboutus.php<br /> <br /> Privacy International. (2006). 2006 International Privacy Survey: Ranking by Country. Retrieved December 16, 2007, from http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd %5B347%5D=x-347-545269<br /> <br /> Province of Nova Scotia. (2006). Personal Information International Disclosure Protection Act. Halifax: Author.<br /> <br /> Province of Nova Scotia. Department of Justice. (2006). "Protection of Privacy Legislation Proclaimed", News Releases, November 15, 2006. Retrieved December 16, 2007 from http://www.gov.ns.ca/news/details.asp?id=20061115005<br /> <br /> Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management &ndash; Volume 5 &ndash; Spring 2009 19<br /> <br /> Province of Nova Scotia &ndash; Department of Justice. (2007a). Home page. Retrieved<br /> <br /> December 16, 2007, from http://www.gov.ns.ca/just/default.asp<br /> <br /> Province of Nova Scotia &ndash; Department of Justice. (2007b). Privacy. Retrieved<br /> <br /> December 16, 2007, from http://www.gov.ns.ca/just/Divisions/IM/FOIPOP/Privacy.asp<br /> <br /> Sabatier, P., &amp; Mazmanian, D. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8, 538-560.<br /> <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1980.tb01266.x" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1980.tb01266.x</a><br /> <br /> Shenon, P. (2003, July 21). Report on U.S. Antiterrorism Law Alleges Violations of Civil Rights. The New York Times, p. A1.<br /> <br /> Stanley, J., &amp; Steinhardt, B. (2007). Even Bigger, Even Weaker: The Emerging Surveillance Society &ndash; Where Are We Now? Washington, D.C.: American Civil Liberties Union.<br /> <br /> United States &ndash; Department of Justice. (2007). Dispelling the Myths. Preserving Life &amp; Liberty. Retrieved November 20, 2007, from http://www.lifeandliberty.gov/subs/u_myths.htm<br /> <br /> United States Senate. (2001, October 24). H.R. 3162, Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act. Washington, D.C.: Author.<br /> <br /> Wispinski, J. (2006). The USA Patriot Act and Canada's Anti-Terrorism Act: Key

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 5 (2009)

Section

Articles

License

Papers published in the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management must be the original, unpublished work of the author. Contributors are responsible for obtaining any copyright clearances required in relation to their work.

Authors submitting a paper to the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management automatically agree to grant a limited license to DJIM if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. This license gives permission for DJIM to publish the paper in a given issue and to maintain the work in the electronic journal archive. DJIM also submits issues to institutional repositories and Open Access repositories.

Contributors agree to each reader accessing, downloading, or printing one copy of their article for their own personal use or research. All other copyrights remain with the author, subject to the requirements that any republication of the work be accompanied by an acknowledgement that the work was first published in the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management and that the DJIM Editorial Chair must be notified of any republication of a work first published in DJIM.

Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management
c/o School of Information Management
Faculty of Management
Dalhousie University
Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building
6100 University Avenue
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5
Canada

Email: djim@dal.ca

Authors should recognize that, because of the nature of the Internet, the publisher has no control over unauthorized copying or editing of protected works.