Breeding Baby Bureaucracies: Essential Factors for the Effective Development of New Organizations

Authors

  • Eric Snow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5931/djim.v6i1.37

Abstract

 

New government organizations face a range of challenges in establishing themselves during and after their initial creation. Without proper consideration, these challenges can hamper organizational development or even cause it to collapse altogether. This paper seeks to identify these challenges in order to explore the strengths and weaknesses of new organizations and to investigate how best to use this knowledge to ensure the successful development of new organizations. This will be accomplished through the discussion of past experiences and the exploration of literature on organizational development. Research points to a set of key criteria that help to reinforce organizations over the course of their development, mitigate potential threats, and establish organizations both internally and within their broader environment. These criteria include the development of a clear organizational objective, support from other institutions, exceptional leadership, and effective use of time. The best practices established here may serve as a framework for the development of new organizations in the future.

References

Aucoin, P. &ldquo;Organizational Design for Governance and Public Management&rdquo;. PUAD 5100 Organizational Design for Governance and Public Management course readings. Halifax, NS: Dalhousie University.<br /> <br /> Bush, G. W. (2002). &ldquo;Homeland Security: Creation of a New Agency&rdquo;. Vital Speeches of the Day, 68(17), p.517-519.<br /> <br /> CBC News. (2009). Disasters may catch Canada unprepared: AG report. CBC News. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/11/03/auditor-general-report.html<br /> <br /> Klassen, T. R. (1996). &ldquo;Organizational design and precarious values: The rise and fall of the Ontario Ministry of Skills Development&rdquo;. Canadian Public Administration, 39(2), 117-135.<br /> <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1996.tb00123.x" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1996.tb00123.x</a><br /> <br /> Malloy, J. (1999). &ldquo;What Makes a State Advocacy Structure Effective? Conflicts Between Bureaucratic and Social Movement Criteria&rdquo;. Governance, 12(3), 267-288.<br /> <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00103" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00103</a><br /> <br /> Office of the Auditor General of Canada. (2009). &ldquo;Chapter 7: Emergency Management &ndash; Public Safety Canada&rdquo;. Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons, Fall 2009. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.<br /> <br /> Public Safety Canada. (November 4, 2009). &ldquo;About us&rdquo;. Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/abt/index-eng.aspx<br /> <br /> Sullivan, L. H. (1896). The tall office building artistically considered. Lippincott&rsquo;s Magazine, March.<br /> <br /> Tyre, M. J., Perlow, L., Staudenmayer, N., &amp; Wasson, C. (1996). Time as a Trigger for Organizational Change. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.<br />

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles