Collaborative public transportation feasibility study: Development of a database prototype
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5931/djim.v9i1.3361Keywords:
Collaboration, transportation, public transit, sustainability, Nova Scotia, information databaseAbstract
The Ecology Action Centre (EAC) has recognized the need for a collaborative information-based transit service that would connect users and transportation providers in the Maritime Provinces. From this need, a multi-disciplinary research partnership between the EAC and Dalhousie University was developed. The research team developed a basic functioning prototype for a web-based transit service. Four main methodological thrusts define the transit database project: first, a review of transit database precedents; second, a usability study of potential database users (n=6); third, a feasibility study reaching of transit providers (n=10); and lastly, web-expert consultation. Additionally, a number of potential funding sources for this project were identified, including community and government grants, web-based advertising and cooperative membership fees. Moreover, the identification of an effective entity under which the Go Maritimes service will be operated (i.e. multi-stakeholder cooperative or private sector enterprise) has been a high priority. This research project has equipped the EAC with the tools it needs to plan, manage, and move forward with the Go Maritimes project.
References
Albalate, D., & Bel, G. (2010). What shapes local public transportation in Europe? Economics, mobility, institutions, and geography. Transportation Research, 46(5), 775–790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2009.12.010
Bhatta, S., & Drennan, M. (2003). The economic benefits of public investment in transportation. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(3), 288-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456X02250317
Birchall, J., & Ketilson, L. (2009). Resilience of the cooperative business model in times of crisis. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/documents/publication/wcms_108416.pdf
Booher, J., & Innes, D. (2002). Network Power in Collaborative Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 221-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0202100301
Brabham, D., Sanchez, T., & Bartholomew, K. (2009). Crowdsourcing public participation in transit planning: preliminary results from the next stop design case. Retrieved from http://pressamp.trb.org/compendium/508/81797BFFDA77.pdf
Canadian Urban Transit Association (2005). Transit in Canada: an industry on the move. Retrieved from http://www.cutaactu.ca/en/publicationsandresearch/resources/IssuePaper No.12_TransitinCanada_AnIndustryontheMove.pdf
Cotfas, L., Croicu, M., & Cotfas, D. (2009). A collaborative GIS solution for public transportation. Informatica Economicčƒ, 13(2), 50-58. http://www.revistaie.ase.ro/content/50/006%20-%20Cotfas.pdf
Dalhousie University (2012). Unit Level Research Ethics Committee. Retrieved from http://www.dal.ca/faculty/agriculture/research/for-researchers/unit-level-research-ethics-committee.html
Degu, G., & Yigzaw, T. (2006). Research Methodology. Retrieved from http://www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/health/ephti/library/lecture_notes/health_science_students/ln_research_method_final.pdf
Doucette, K. (2012). Nova Scotia to change intercity bus rules. Retrieved from http://metronews.ca/news/canada/442503/nova-scotia-to-change-intercity-bus-rules/
Ecology Action Centre (2012). About the Ecology Action Centre. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ecologyaction.ca/
Expedia Inc. (2012). Your Trip, Your Way. Retrieved from http://www.expedia.ca
Fraser, L. (2012). Shuttle service gets rolling. Retrieved from http://thechronicleherald.ca/metro/145966-shuttle-service-gets-rolling
Glicken, M. (2003). Social research methods: a simple guide. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Gómez, A. (2004). Transit Planning in Curitiba and Bogotá. Roles in Interaction, Risk, and Change. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/28791
Google Inc. (2012). Google Maps/Transit. Retrieved from http://maps.google.ca
Government of Newfoundland and Labrador (2012). Module #1: basics of the cooperative model. Retrieved from http://www.ibrd.gov.nl.ca/regionaldev/Basics_of__Co_operative.pdf
Government of Nova Scotia (2012). Nova Scotia moves. Retrieved from http://www.gov.ns.ca/energy/nsmoves/documents/Nova-Scotia-Moves-Pilot-description.pdf
Groszko, W. (2010). Which way forward? A public transit map of Nova Scotia. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyaction.ca/files/file/transit_forward_groszko.pdf
Health Design and Technology Institute (2012). Usability Studies: Taking Part. Coventry University. Retrieved from: http://wwwm.coventry.ac.uk/hdti/Getinvolved/Documents/HDTIUsabilityStudies-TakingPart.pdf
Hofstrand, D., & Holz-Clause, M. (2009). What is a Feasibility Study? Retrieved from https://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/wholefarm/html/c5-65.html
Jones, M., Rieger, R., Treadwell, P., & Gay, G. (2000). Live from the stacks: user feedback on mobile computers and wireless tools for library patrons. In Proceedings from the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries. San Antonio, Texas. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/336597.336646
Jupp, V. (2006). The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311(7000), 299-302. http://www.bmj.com/content/311/7000/299
McCall, D., & Young, J. (2005). Eliminating static from strategic planning. Retrieved from http://www.facilitate.com/support/facilitator-toolkit/docs/Strategic-Planning-Goes-Online.pdf
MindSea Development Inc. (2012). Transit 360. Retrieved from https://itunes.apple.com/ca/app/%20transit-360/id350572383?mt=8
Murgado-Armenteros, E., Torres-Ruiz, F., & Vega-Zamora, M. (2012). Differences between online and face-to-face focus group, viewed through two approaches. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2), 73-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762012000200008
Newfoundland & Labrador Tourism (2012). Plan Your Trip. Retrieved from http://www.newfoundlandlabrador.com/planyourtrip
Planning and Design Center. (2011). It‘s More Than Buses Next Steps. Retrieved from http://pdcentre.ca/2011/09/its-more-than-buses-session-3-outcomes/
Province of Nova Scotia (2012). Eight Community Transit Groups Receive Funding. Retrieved from http://novascotia.ca/news/release/?id=20120726004
Saskatchewan Transportation Company (2012). Welcome to STC. Retrieved from http://www.stcbus.com/
Slevin, D., & Pinto, J. (1987). Balancing strategies and tactics in project implementation. Sloan Management Review, 29(1), 33-41. http://www.iei.liu.se/fek/utbildning/kurskatalog/723g18/articles_and_papers/1.107456/PintoSlevin1988.pdf
Social Finance (2010). The what, why, who, and most importantly, the how of social finance in Canada. Retrieved from http://socialfinance.ca/guide/am-i-eligible/legal-structures-charities-non-profits-and-co-operatives
Taylor, B., & Schweitzer, L. (2005). Assessing the experience of mandated collaborative inter-jurisdictional transport planning in the United States. Transport Policy, 12(6), 500-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.04.004
Transportation Canada (2012). Transportation in Canada 2011: Comprehensive Review. Retrieved from http://www.tc.gc.ca/media/documents/policy/Transportation_in_Canada_2011.pdf
Transportation Research Board (2006). Transportation Knowledge Networks: A Management Strategy for the 21st Century. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/sr/sr284.pdf
Ugboro, I., Obeng, K., & Talley, W. (2001). Motivations and impediments to service contracting, consolidations, and strategic alliances in public transit organizations. Administration & Society, 33(1), 79-103. http://ejournal.narotama.ac.id/files/79.pdf
Walter, A., & Scholz, R. (2007). Critical success conditions of collaborative methods: a coparative evaluation of transport planning projects. Transportation, 34(2), 195–212. http://www.uns.ethz.ch/people/formerhead/scholzr/publ/1545.pdf
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Papers published in the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management must be the original, unpublished work of the author. Contributors are responsible for obtaining any copyright clearances required in relation to their work.
Authors submitting a paper to the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management automatically agree to grant a limited license to DJIM if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. This license gives permission for DJIM to publish the paper in a given issue and to maintain the work in the electronic journal archive. DJIM also submits issues to institutional repositories and Open Access repositories.
Contributors agree to each reader accessing, downloading, or printing one copy of their article for their own personal use or research. All other copyrights remain with the author, subject to the requirements that any republication of the work be accompanied by an acknowledgement that the work was first published in the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management and that the DJIM Editorial Chair must be notified of any republication of a work first published in DJIM.
Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management
c/o School of Information Management
Faculty of Management
Dalhousie University
Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building
6100 University Avenue
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5
Canada
Email: djim@dal.ca
Authors should recognize that, because of the nature of the Internet, the publisher has no control over unauthorized copying or editing of protected works.
