Stop, Collaborate and Listen: An Assessment of Canada‘s Open Dialogue Implementation Strategy

Authors

  • Jim Boyle School of Public Administration, Dalhousie University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5931/djim.v10i1.3348

Keywords:

open source, metagovernance, consultation, collaborative digital governance

Abstract

As part of Canada‘s Action Plan on Open Government, the federal government has adopted a policy activity stream of Open Dialogue to engage stakeholders in the policymaking and regulatory processes. This is an essential step in moving towards a system of decentred collaborative metagovernance to meet the demands of a rapidly changing governance structure, but a policy is only as good as its likelihood of successful implementation. Utilizing the implementation assessment framework of Mazmanian and Sabatier (1981), this paper explores the chances for successful implementation of the Open Dialogue activity stream, concluding that the primary impediment is the structure of the Westminster system. The government‘s response to this impediment will determine their role in the burgeoning new governance system.

Author Biography

Jim Boyle, School of Public Administration, Dalhousie University

First year student in Dalhousie's Master of Public Administration/Juris Doctor joint degree program

References

Bang, Henrik, and Anders Esmark. "Good Governance in Network Society:

Reconfiguring the Political from Politics to Policy." Administrative Theory and Praxis 31.1 (Mar 2009). Web.

Bevir, Mark. Key Concepts in Governance. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2009. Print.

Canada. Treasury Board Secretariat. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat - Report

on Plans and Priorities 2012-2013. Government of Canada. Web. 4 Dec. 2012. <http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rpp/2012-2013/inst/tbd/tbd01-eng.asp>.

Clarke, Amanda. "Open Dialogue" and the Government of Canada's Use of Social

Media: Bureaucratic Barriers to Democratic Engagement in the Digital Era. Working paper. Edmonton: Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, 2012. Googledocs. Web. 4 Dec. 2012.

Clift, Steven. “E-Democracy, E-Governance and Public Net-work.” 2003. Web. 1 Dec.

<http://www.publicus.net/articles/edempublicnetwork.html.>

Craft, Jonathan. Public Servants Control Government. Ed. Roberto P. Leone and Frank

L. K. Ohemeng. Toronto: Emond Montgomery Publications, 2011. 54-64. Print.

Doberstein, Carey. ‘Metagovernance‘ of Urban Governance Networks in Canada: In

Pursuit of Legitimacy and Accountability. Working paper. Print.

Doern, G. Bruce, and Richard W. Phidd. Canadian Public Policy: Ideas, Structure,

Process. Toronto: Methuen, 1983. Print.

Dutil, Patrice A., Cosmo Howard, John Langford, and Jeffrey Roy. The Service State:

Rhetoric, Reality and Promise. Ottawa: University of Ottawa, 2010. Print.

Eaves, David. "Using the Tools of the 21st Century: Open Data and Wikis."

Approaching Public Administration: Core Debates and Emerging Issues. Ed. Roberto P. Leone and Frank L. K. Ohemeng. Toronto: Emond Montgomery Publications, 2011. 309-317. Print.

Elections Canada. “Voter Turnout at Federal Elections and Referendums.” Jan. 16,

Government of Canada. Web. 1 Dec. 2012. <http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=ele&dir=turn&document=index&lang=e>

Flynn, Greg L. "Politicians Control Government." Approaching Public Administration:

Core Debates and Emerging Issues. Ed. Roberto P. Leone and Frank L. K. Ohemeng. Toronto: Emond Montgomery Publications, 2011. 43-53. Print.

Government of Canada. Canada's Action Plan on Open Government. 2012. Web.

<http://www.open.gc.ca>

Hubbard, Ruth, and Gilles Paquet. The Black Hole of Public Administration. Ottawa:

University of Ottawa, 2010a. Print.

Hubbard, Ruth, and Gilles Paquet. The Case for Decentralized Federalism. Ottawa:

University of Ottawa, 2010b. Print.

Ibbitson, John. “The Alarming Decline in Voter Turnout.” The Globe and Mail. Oct. 14,

Web. < http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/the-alarming-decline-in-voter-turnout/article4247507/>

Korac-Kakabadse, Andrew and Nada Korac-Kakabadse. "Information Technology's

Impact on the Quality of Democracy." Reinventing Government in the Information Age. Ed. Richard Heeks. New York: Routledge, 2001. 211-28. Print.

Kotter, John P. Leading Change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, 1996. Print.

Mazmanian, Daniel A., and Paul A. Sabatier. Effective Policy Implementation.

Lexington, MA: Lexington, 1981. Print.

Nanos, Nik. “Canadians Rate Highly the Issues Close to Their Day-to-Day Lives.”

Policy Options. August 2012.

Noveck, Beth Simone. Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government

Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2009. Print.

OGP Consultation Guidelines. Open Government Partnership. Web. 4 Dec. 2012.

<http://www.opengovpartnership.org/sites/www.opengovpartnership.org/files/page_files/OGP%20Public%20Consultation%20Guidlines.pdf>.

Pal, Les. Beyond Policy Implementation: Public Issue Management in Turbulent Times.

Scarborough, ON: Nelson, 1997. Print.

Paquet, Gilles. "Slouching Toward a Relatively Stateless State." Optimum Online 42.2

(2012). June 2012. Web. 1 Dec. 2012. <http://www.optimumonline.ca/print.phtml?id=414>.

Roy, Jeffrey. E-government in Canada: Transformation for the Digital Age. Ottawa:

University of Ottawa, 2006. Print.

Solomon, Howard. "Social Media Pushes Government, Says Clement." IT World

Canada. 17 Feb. 2012. Web. 1 Dec. 2012. <http://www.itworldcanada.com/news/social-media-pushes-government-says-clement/144906>.

Stuewe, David. "Roles, Responsibilities & Relationships." PUAD 5100. Dalhousie

University School of Public Administration, Halifax. 28 Nov. 2012. Lecture.

Torney, Jennifer. “Government 2.0: Why Social Media Makes Sense.” Fleishman-

Hillard. Jan. 25, 2012. Web. 1 Dec 2012. < http://fleishman.ca/2012/01/government-2-0-why-social-media-makes-sense/>

Downloads

Published

2014-04-03

Issue

Section

Articles