Evaluation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Modifications to the Petitcodiac River Causeway
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5931/djim.v10i1.4131Keywords:
environmental impact assessment, environmental management, cumulative effects assessment, social impact assessment, monitoringAbstract
This paper is an evaluation of the environmental impact assessment report for the modifications to the Petitcodiac River Causeway. The environmental impact assessment (EIA) is an internationally utilized tool that is applied to inform decision makers of the environmental effects of industrial, commercial, and municipal undertakings (among other human activities); beyond this, EIAs provide a knowledge base for similar undertakings in the future. Using scholarly literature on the topic and regulatory framework references, this paper examines the expectation, reality, and divergence of three key themes in the given report with the aim of gauging its performance as an example of a modern EIA. Based on the report‘s commitment to monitoring and follow-up, cumulative effects assessment, and social impact assessment, the Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Modifications to the Petitcodiac River Causeway performs very strongly in light of academic criticisms of typical Canadian EIA practices.
References
AMEC New Brunswick Department of Supply and Services, (2005). Environmental impact assessment report for modifications to the Petitcodiac river causeway (YB299A).
Becker, D., Harris, C., Nielsen, E., & McLaughlin, W. (2004). A comparison of a technical and a participatory application of social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22(3), 177-189.
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. (2012, 07 06). Addressing cumulative environmental effects under the Canadian environmental assessment act: Background. Retrieved from: http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=1F77F3C2-1.
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. (2013a, 03 15). Canadian environmental assessment act, 2012: Overview. Retrieved from http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=16254939-1.
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (2013b, 11 27). Policy and guidelines: Former Canadian environmental assessment act. Retrieved from http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=F1F30EEF-1.
Canter, L. (1999). Cumulative effects assessment in a handbook of environmental impact assessment. (pp. 405-440). Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Science.
Duinker, P. (1989). Ecological effects monitoring in environmental assessment: What can it accomplish? Environmental Management. 13 (6), 797-805.
Duinker, P., Greig, L. (2005). The impotence of cumulative effects assessment in
Canada: Ailments and ideas for redeployment. Environmental Management, 37 (2), 153161.
Fenton, M. (2005). Guidebook on social impact assessment, prepared for the Comprehensive Coastal Assessment. Environment and Behaviour Consultants, Townsville, Queensland.
Freudenburg, W. (1986). Social Impact Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 451-78.
Hegmann, G., Cocklin, C., Creasey, R., Dupuis, S., Kennedy, A., Kingsley, L., Ross, W., Spaling, H., Stalker, D. (1999). Cumulative effects assessment practitioners guide. Prepared by AXYS Environmental Consulting Ltd. and the CEA Working Group, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Hull, Quebec.
International Association for Impact Assessment (2013). Multilingual Glossary: Social Impact Assessment. Retrieved from: http://web2.concordia.ca/iaia/index.php?glossaryselect=&beginswith=S&PHPSESSID=a7f9aec2b739af60414f978c89222096.
Lane, M., Ross, H., Dale, A. (1997). Social impact research: Integrating the technical, political, and planning paradigms. Human Organization, 56 (3), 302-310.
Locke, A. (2001). Annotated bibliography of aquatic biology and habitat of the Petitcodiac River system. New Brunswick, Part 2. Can. Manuscr. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. no. 2561.
Morrison-Saunders, A., J. Arts, J. Baker and P. Caldwell (2001). Roles and stakes in environmental impact assessment follow-up. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 19, 289–296.
New Brunswick Department of Supply and Services (2002, 9). Guidelines for an environmental impact assessment: Modifications to the Petitcodiac river causeway. Department of the Environment and Local Government for the Province of New Brunswick and Fisheries and Oceans Canada, YB299A.
Niles, E. (2001). Review of the Petitcodiac river causeway and fish passage issues: Final report. E.J. Niles & Associates, Cap Pele, New Brunswick, 2001.
Vanclay F. (2003) Social impact assessment: International principles, International Association for Impact Assessment, Special Publication Series, 2.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Papers published in the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management must be the original, unpublished work of the author. Contributors are responsible for obtaining any copyright clearances required in relation to their work.
Authors submitting a paper to the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management automatically agree to grant a limited license to DJIM if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. This license gives permission for DJIM to publish the paper in a given issue and to maintain the work in the electronic journal archive. DJIM also submits issues to institutional repositories and Open Access repositories.
Contributors agree to each reader accessing, downloading, or printing one copy of their article for their own personal use or research. All other copyrights remain with the author, subject to the requirements that any republication of the work be accompanied by an acknowledgement that the work was first published in the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management and that the DJIM Editorial Chair must be notified of any republication of a work first published in DJIM.
Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management
c/o School of Information Management
Faculty of Management
Dalhousie University
Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building
6100 University Avenue
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5
Canada
Email: djim@dal.ca
Authors should recognize that, because of the nature of the Internet, the publisher has no control over unauthorized copying or editing of protected works.