The Road Between: An Interim First Nations Accountability Regime
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5931/djim.v11i0.5515Keywords:
Accountability, First Nations, Outcome ManagementAbstract
The Federal Government of Canada‘s current First Nations accountability regime is an extension of a longstanding paternalistic relationship with First Nations governments, and the struggle to build final agreements is indicative of Canada‘s resistance to First Nations sovereignty. This paper explores an interim accountability regime during the negotiations of these final agreements. The accountability regime will need to reconcile notions of First Nations self-governance to indigenize accountability both within and across First Nations. The Federal Government of Canada can foster First Nations governance with the implementation of the Kelowna Accord and by working collaboratively with First Nations governments to identify an appropriate interim accountability regime through Outcome Management.
References
Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada. (2014). Highlights from the report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal peoples. Government of Canada. Canadian Catalogue no. Z1-1991/1-6E. Obtained at: http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100014597/1100100014637#chp3
Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (2014). Tsawwassen First Nation Final Agreement, 2006, Chapter 16 8(g). Government of Canada. Obtained at: https://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100022706/1100100022717
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2014). Estimates of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, June 2011. Australian Government. Australian Government Catalogue number 3238.0.55.001. Obtained at: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3238.0.55.001
Brunet-Jailly, E. (2008). The Governance and Fiscal Environment of First Nations‘ Fiscal Intergovernmental Relations in Comparative Perspectives. National Centre for First Nations Governance. Obtained at: http://fngovernance.org/ncfng_research/emmanual_brunet-jailley.pdf
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. (2014). Indigenous Affairs Advancement Strategy. Australian Government. http://www.dpmc.gov.au/indigenous_affairs/ias/index.cfm
Gerson, J. (2013). Federal funding not a problem for First Nations as yearly spending has risen to $9,056 per capita, study finds. National Post. Obtained at: http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/12/10/federal-funding-not-a-problem-for-first-nations-as-yearly-spending-has-risen-to-9056-per-capita-study-finds/
Justice Laws. (2014). The Indian Act, 1985, I-5. Government of Canada: Ottawa ON. Obtained at: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/i-5/page-1.html
Justice Laws (2014). The Kelowna Accord Implementation Act. Government of Canada: Ottawa ON. Obtained at: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/K-0.65/page-1.html
Lawrence, B. (2003). Gender, race, and the regulation of Native identity in Canada and the United States: An overview. Hypatia 18(2), 3-31
Milloy, J. (2008). Indian Act colonialism: A century of dishonour, 1869-1969. National Centre for First Nations Governance. Obtained at: http://fngovernance.org/ncfng_research/milloy.pdf
Morse, B. (1984). Aboriginal self-government in Canada and Australia. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations: Kingston, ON. Obtained at: http://www.queensu.ca/iigr/pub/archive/aboriginalpapers/background/BG4AboriginalSelf-GovernmentInAustraliaandCanada.pdf
Pratt, A. (2004). Treaties vs. Terra Nullius: “Reconciliation,” treaty-making and Indigenous sovereignty in Australia and Canada. Indigenous Law Journal 3, Fall 2014: 43-60.
Prince, M. (2011). Federal accountability regimes and First Nations governance. Approaching Public Administration: Core Debates and Emerging Issues. Emond Montgomery Publications Ltd.: Toronto ON, 325-331
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. (2014). Outcome Management. Government of Canada. Obtained at: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/emf-cag/outcome-resultat/lessons-lecons/lessons-lecons02-eng.asp
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Papers published in the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management must be the original, unpublished work of the author. Contributors are responsible for obtaining any copyright clearances required in relation to their work.
Authors submitting a paper to the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management automatically agree to grant a limited license to DJIM if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. This license gives permission for DJIM to publish the paper in a given issue and to maintain the work in the electronic journal archive. DJIM also submits issues to institutional repositories and Open Access repositories.
Contributors agree to each reader accessing, downloading, or printing one copy of their article for their own personal use or research. All other copyrights remain with the author, subject to the requirements that any republication of the work be accompanied by an acknowledgement that the work was first published in the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management and that the DJIM Editorial Chair must be notified of any republication of a work first published in DJIM.
Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management
c/o School of Information Management
Faculty of Management
Dalhousie University
Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building
6100 University Avenue
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5
Canada
Email: djim@dal.ca
Authors should recognize that, because of the nature of the Internet, the publisher has no control over unauthorized copying or editing of protected works.
