Managing Print-Based Weeding Projects in Academic Libraries

Hilary Barbara Lynd


“Weeding” is the process of removing information resources from a collection. As a public relations quagmire, it is one of the most challenging tasks an information manager may face. With the rise of election resources, print-based weeding projects are on the rise. It is integral that information managers have the necessary skills to carry out this endeavor. This paper examines the best practices for managing a print-based weeding project in an academic library, based on recent literature and the author’s work experience. A set of recommendations for choosing material to remove, developing workflows, managing public relations and finding solutions for discarded material are put forward.  


Collections; Information Resources; Weeding; Deselection; Collection Development; Public Relations; Workflows

Full Text:



Banks, J. (2002). Weeding book collections in the age of the internet. Collection Building, 21(3); 113-119.

The Blockhouse School Project. (2014). The Blockhouse School Project. Retrieved from

Bravender, P. & Long, V. (2011). Weeding an outdated collection in an automated retrieval system. Collection Management, 36(4), 237-245. DOI: 10.1080/01462679.2011.605290

British Library. (2014). Legal deposit. British Library. Retrieved from

Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. (2003). Health and safety guide for libraries. Hamilton, Ontario: Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety.

Dubicki, E. (2008). Weeding: facing the fears. Collection Building, 27 (4), 132-135. Retrieved from

Fohl, C. (2002). Weeding. Community & Junior College Libraries, 10(3), 47-50, DOI: 10.1300/J107v10n03_06

Handis, M. W. (2007). Practical advice for weeding in small academic libraries. Collection Building, 26(3), 84-87. DOI:

Kailova, L. (2014). Trash or cash?: Partnering with online booksellers to dispose of deselected academic library monographs. Behavioural & Social Sciences Librarian, 33(2), 59-76, DOI: 10.1080/01639269.2014.904687

MacKay, M. (2014). Building a book tree or, how and why libraries weed their collections. The Libvine. Retrieved from

Matlak, J. (2010). Weeding older social sciences journals. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 29(3), 169-183, DOI:

Metz, P. & Gray, C. (2005). Public relations and library weeding. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(3), 273-279.

Pidgeon, A. (1995). On writing a deselection policy: Or, how to toss books without public condemnation. Against the Grain, 86(2). 68-69.

Ronadin, C. Simonsen, L. & Vogh, B. S. (2009). Low-cost method of removing periodical duplicates using a collection growth formula at a medium-sized academic library. Library Collections Acquisitions & Technical Services, 33. 119-122.

Slote, S. J. (1997). Weeding library collections: Library weeding methods. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.

Snyder, C. E. (2014). Data-driven deselection: multiple point data using a decision support tool in an academic library. Collection Management, 39(1), 17-31, DOI: 10.1080/01462679.2013.866607

Soma, A. K. & Sjoberg, L. M. (2010). More than just low-hanging fruit: a collaborative approach to weeding in academic libraries. Collection Management, 36(1) 17-28, DOI: 10.1080/01462679.2011.529241

Steele, K. (2008). Space equals money. The Bottom Line, 21(4); 122-123. DOI:

Terrance, L. C. (2013a). Weeding worries, part 1: books. The Bottom Line: Managing library finances, 26(3), 98-102. DOI:

Terrance, L. C. (2013b). Weeding worries, part 2: journals. The Bottom Line: Managing library finances, 26(4), 135-139. DOI:

Welch, J.M, Cauble, L. A. & Little, L. B. (2000). The evolution of technology in the management of noncirculating Library Collections. Technical Services Quarterly, 17(4), 1-11, DOI: 10.1300/J124v17n04_01



  • There are currently no refbacks.