Peering into the Private Lives of Judges: Reconciling Judicial Accountability and Privacy


  • Nancy Li


Members of the Canadian courts are expected to maintain a rigorous degree of professionalism and good conduct in maintaining an independent, impartial and accountable judiciary. Yet, judges bring their diverse past experiences and values to bench and lead complex lives off the bench. Through examination of the judicial discipline of former Justice Lori Douglas in 2010, this paper makes a two-fold argument. Firstly, although the integrity of conduct by members of the judiciary must be held to the highest standard of public accountability, diverse backgrounds and lived experiences of judges allow for better informed decision-making and thereby, increase public confidence. Secondly, privacy of non-judicial activities ought to be protected to the extent that such activities do not erode public confidence in the judiciary. The diversity of lived experiences and backgrounds of judges is what makes the bench representative and credible in the eyes of Canadians. It is important that policies of the Canadian Judicial Council address these issues in creating workable inquiry and disciplinary procedures that truly further judicial accountability in the eyes of the public in a manner that is efficient yet mitigates harm to individual judges under investigation.

Author Biography

Nancy Li

Nancy Li is a second year combined degree JD/MLIS student at the Schulich School of Law and School of Information Management at Dalhousie University. She is keenly interested in the interstices of law, policy-making and information management, particularly privacy and freedom of expression in the Canadian legal, social and political contexts. The submission entitled Blocked: Reconciling Social Media Censorship and Freedom of Expression was written for INFO 5500 Information in Society. The submission entitled Peering into the Private Lives of Judges: Reconciling Judicial Accountability and Privacy was written for INFO 6610 Information Policy. 


Arsenault-Cameron v. Prince Edward Island, 2000 SCC 1, [2000] 1 SCR 3.

Blatchford, C. Christie Blatchford on Lori Douglas scandal: Lesson may be that even judges aren‘t immune to power of sex pictures and the web. Retrieved from douglas-scandal-may-be-that-even-judges-arent-immune-to-power-of-sex-pictures-and- the-web

Canadian Judicial Council. Statement by the Canadian Judicial Council regarding the Inquiry in to the conduct of the Honourable Lori Douglas. Retrieved from

Canadian Judicial Council. (2017). Mandate and powers. Retrieved from https://www.cjc-

CBC News. Judge Lori Douglas's offer to retire early accepted by judicial panel. Retrieved from

CBC News. Nude Photos of Judge Contained in Compliant. Retrieved from complaint-1.900235

Constitution Act, 1867, 30 & 31 Vict, c 3, ss 96-100.

Duff, A. S. (2004). The Past, present and future of information policy, Information Communication and Society, 7(1), 69-87. doi: 10.1080/1369118042000208906

Friedland, M. Discipline, A Place Apart: Judicial Independence and Accountability in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Judicial Council.

Judges Act. R.S.C., 1985, c. J-1, s 99.

Miller, A. (1970). Public Confidence in the Judiciary: Some Notes and Reflections, Law and Contemporary Problems, 35(1) 69-93. doi: 10.2307/1191030

Orna, E. (2008). Information policies: yesterday, today, tomorrow, Journal of Information Science 34(4), 547-565, doi: 10.1177/0165551508092256

Puxley, C. Former Manitoba judge compares disciplinary hearing to 'torture'. Retrieved from

Welch, A. Former judge Lori Douglas opens up about the hurt caused by CJC hearing. Retrieved from Douglas-364299101.html