Saviours or Burdens? The Effects of Streaming Services on the Music Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5931/djim.v15i0.8984Keywords:
streaming services, streaming technology, music industry, SpotifyAbstract
This research essay provides an overview of streaming services and their effects on the music industry, and the tensions they have created between various stakeholders. The problem of the “end” of the music industry is addressed through discussing the transition of music from analog to digital, the history of music piracy, and the value of music as a commodity. Technological, institutional, and cultural tensions are highlighted, and revenue distribution is described and analyzed, as is the interplay of algorithmic and human curation of playlists. Legal issues are also raised involving the privacy of users and intellectual property rights of artists. A middle ground is sought, and possible solutions are proposed to reconcile these tensions, with the future of the music industry in mind.
References
Ball, M. (2015, July 28). Less money, mo‘ music & lots of problems: A look at the music biz. REDEF. Retrieved from https://redef.com/original/less-money-mo-music-lots-of-problems-the-past-present-and-future-of-the-music-biz
Canadian Independent Music Association (CIMA). (2010, July 13). The Canadian music industry in a digital world. Digital Canada 150. Retrieved from https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/028.nsf/eng/00331.html
Fisher, E. (2018). When information wanted to be free: Discursive bifurcation of information and the origins of Web 2.0. The Information Society, 34(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1391910
Hamari, J., Hanner, N., & Koivisto, J. (2017). Service quality explains why people use freemium services but not if they go premium: An empirical study in free-to-play games. International Journal of Information Management, 37(1), 1449–1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.09.004
John, N. A., & Peters, B. (2017). Why privacy keeps dying: The trouble with talk about the end of privacy. Information, Communication & Society, 20(2), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1167229
Knapp, L. (2012, March). Up the stream. Canadian Musician, 34, 42-46. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.library.dal.ca/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.library.dal.ca/docview/1017883509?accountid=10406
Krukowski, D. (2018, January 30). How to be a responsible music fan in the age of streaming. Pitchfork. Retrieved from https://pitchfork.com/features/oped/how-to-be-a-responsible-music-fan-in-the-age-of-streaming/
Lutz, C., Hoffman, C.P., Bucher, E., & Fieseler, C. (2018). The role of privacy concerns in the sharing economy. Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1472-1492. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1339726
Marshall, L. (2015, October 29). Let‘s keep music special. F-- Spotify: On-demand streaming and the controversy over artist royalties. Creative Industries Journal, 8(2), 177-189. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2015.1096618
McConnell, J. (2016, September 2). Move aside algorithms, meet the tastemakers: Music streaming services bring humans back into the equation. Financial Post. Retrieved from https://business.financialpost.com/technology/step-aside-algorithms-meet-the-tastemakers-who-curate-the-major-streaming-music-services
Millard, D. (2017, April 7). F-- algorithms, college radio is a reminder of how great music can be when nobody‘s trying to make money. Noisey. Retrieved from https://noisey.vice.com/en_ca/article/xy9bg3/fuck-algorithms-college-radio-is-a-reminder-of-how-great-music-can-be-when-nobodys-trying-to-make-money
Pelly, L. (2017, December 4). The problem with muzak. The Baffler, 37. Retrieved from https://thebaffler.com/salvos/the-problem-with-muzak-pelly
Riley, J. (2017). Understanding metadata: What is metadata, and what is it for? Retrieved from https://groups.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/17446/Understanding%20Metadata.pdf
Wang, S. (2017). The cloud, online piracy, and global copyright governance. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(3), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877916628239
Willson, M. (2017). Algorithms (and the) everyday. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1200645
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Papers published in the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management must be the original, unpublished work of the author. Contributors are responsible for obtaining any copyright clearances required in relation to their work.
Authors submitting a paper to the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management automatically agree to grant a limited license to DJIM if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. This license gives permission for DJIM to publish the paper in a given issue and to maintain the work in the electronic journal archive. DJIM also submits issues to institutional repositories and Open Access repositories.
Contributors agree to each reader accessing, downloading, or printing one copy of their article for their own personal use or research. All other copyrights remain with the author, subject to the requirements that any republication of the work be accompanied by an acknowledgement that the work was first published in the Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management and that the DJIM Editorial Chair must be notified of any republication of a work first published in DJIM.
Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management
c/o School of Information Management
Faculty of Management
Dalhousie University
Kenneth C. Rowe Management Building
6100 University Avenue
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5
Canada
Email: djim@dal.ca
Authors should recognize that, because of the nature of the Internet, the publisher has no control over unauthorized copying or editing of protected works.
